Pages

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Copyrights Part 2


Laws That Choke Creativity:

The video I watched on TED.com by Larry Lessig was concerning Copyright and the digital age. Lessig "has built a reputation as the king of Internet law and as the most important next-wave thinker on intellectual property" (New York Magazine, 2008). His unique look at how copyright law should be is revolutionary, not only to the owner of the copyright but also for the public that wants to use specific copy written material and does not know about copyright laws, namely kids. Lessig give examples of how kids take what is old and worn out and “remixes” it to become something new and refreshing. He explains that these remixes are a way for this new generation to speak (how this generation expresses themselves).





How YouTube Thinks About Copyright:

Margaret Stewart is the head of user experience at YouTube. Stewart explains how YouTube finds any form of copyright infringement through software that analyzes the “20 hours of video a minute and over 100 years of video per day” that is uploaded in to YouTube and how it is “referenced against the millions of content already in the database”. She then goes on to explain that the copyright owner has the right to say which videos can be posted. She then gave an example of a wedding video that used a song owned by a record company and it received over 40 million views. The song used had been off the charts for 18 month and was suddenly back at number 4 because of the allowed use of the song in the video.






Dennis S. Karjala



International Copyright in the Digital Age

Dennis Karjala is a professor of law at Arizona State University. Throughout his video he explains what intellectual property is and the differences between a copyright and a patent. He also goes on to explain just how hard it is to implement copyright protection in today’s digital age.







Together all three videos form a solution to the problem that Karjala explains. Since the internet is so vast and there are so many form of technology in the world that help the average person create a copyright infringement with the click of a button, why not embrace it instead of fight it? Stewart’s video shows how a home video brought a song that was no longer popular back into the main stream. Lessig shows that there is an up and coming generation that has grown up with the basic knowledge to “remix” content to create a fresh new concept. Putting all three aspects together will not only help the industry grow but help put a stop to the “war” that Lessig referred to in his video.

References:
Ted.com
YouTube.com





Monday, July 11, 2011

Copyrights and Plagiarism

I have lost count of all the plagiarism cases I have heard of in the music industry. For example, there are artists that do not pay royalties for covering another artist music or song. Of course there are other form of plagiarism, only, I do not believe that it is plagiarism.

Let me see how I can explain this. There are 7 chords in a key. And there are only 12 major keys and 12 minor keys. So there are 24 keys all together.
Now lets say that only one artist can ever use the key of b flat. That means that there can only be 24 artists that can exist today because the rest would be plagiarizing. Well that doesn’t make any since does it? The answer is no, it doesn’t make since. Therefore no one is allowed to copyright a specific key or chord progression.

This ruling is the cause of many different lawsuits throughout music history for plagiarism.

I am going to use an example that is not too old and people can relate to. The case is Joe Satriani (If I Could Fly) vs. Coldplay (Viva La Vida).


Both Coldplay and Satriani's song for you to compare.






Opinions on the Satriani Vs. Coldplay lawsuit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5tgeaBhbtE&feature=related

I have to admit that both song sound alike but in my opinion it is just a coincidence. But the chord progression used is a common chord progression and it had been used many times before even Satriani used it. Take Cat Stevens (Foreigner Suite) and Creaky Boards (The Songs I didn’t Write). All these songs have the same chord progression and tempo but it doesn’t mean that it is plagiarism. If it was then Cat Stevens would be the owner of the chord progression and none of the songs mentioned above would be a part of our musical library.

Samples of the above mentioned songs





In the end of this intense battle between Satriani and Coldplay there was a settlement between them for an undisclosed amount. I personally think that Coldplay gave in to easily and that in time they would have won the battle. Satriani does not have any rights to the chords used in Viva La Vida.

Bellow are some other songs that contain the same chord progressions. You be the judge if it is plagiarism or not.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pidokakU4I

Video Links/ references provided under each video.